Business
|
Written by
Jonathan Haputra
"Brand strategy" shows up on almost every branding agency's proposal and means almost nothing consistent across them. One agency's brand strategy is a 2-hour stakeholder interview and a mood board. Another's is 6weeks of competitive research, audience interviews, and a positioning document thick enough to leave a mark on a desk. Another's is a slide deck with your mission statement and three adjectives arranged in a Venn diagram.
None of this is necessarily dishonest. The field just doesn't have agreed-upon definitions the way, say, software development does. But it does mean that when you're evaluating proposals, "includes brand strategy" tells you almost nothing about what you're actually paying for.
Here's what it includes when it's done properly.
Market research and competitive analysis
This is the starting point, and also the first thing that gets compressed or skipped when an engagement is underpriced.
Real competitive research means examining how the other companies in your space are positioning themselves, not just noting who they are, but reading how they talk about themselves, what visual territory they occupy, what claims they're making, and where the gaps are. This is what determines whether the brand that gets built actually occupies distinct territory or just executes well within the same category conventions everyone else is using.
Audience definition
Demographic profiles are the starting point, not the destination. Age, location, and job title tell you who the person is on paper. What actually matters for brand strategy is how that person thinks: what do they believe before they encounter your brand? What are they skeptical of based on previous experiences in the category? What language do they use to describe the problem your product solves?
The reason this matters beyond marketing is that it shapes tone, visual language, and positioning. A brand built for someone who's been burned by overpromising competitors sounds and looks different from a brand built for someone who's making a first-time purchase in the category. Getting this wrong at the strategy stage means every visual and verbal decision that follows is solving for the wrong person.
Positioning
Positioning is the strategic decision about what specific territory your brand occupies, what you stand for, what you explicitly don't, and how that maps to a place in the market that's both credible and distinct.
A positioning statement isn't a tagline. "The most trusted platform for X" is not positioning. "Innovative solutions for modern teams" is not positioning. Positioning is specific enough to rule things out to say clearly who you're not for and what you don't do, and most companies resist it because it feels like narrowing down. The narrowing is the point. A brand that tries to be for everyone is legible to no one.
Messaging
Messaging is where strategy becomes language. It's the translation of positioning into the actual words that appear in front of customers: how the company is described in a single sentence, what the key claims are, how those claims are ordered hierarchically, and what proof supports each one.
This is the layer that feeds into website copy, pitch decks, sales 1-pagers, and any other content the company produces. Without it, every piece of copy gets written from scratch with no shared foundation, and the brand's verbal identity becomes as inconsistent as a visual identity without guidelines.
Tone of voice
Two companies can have identical positioning and sound completely different depending on how they say things. Tone of voice is the set of decisions that determine how the brand communicates, which are direct or conversational, technical or plain-spoken, confident or approachable, dry or warm.
This component is often treated as an afterthought, which is why so many startup brands sound either like a TechCrunch press release or an overly casual Twitter account, depending on who wrote what that week.
How to tell when you're not getting the real brand strategy
Ask to see an example of a brand strategy document from a previous project. Any agency doing this work properly should be able to share one, with identifying details removed if needed.
What the document looks like tells you a lot. If it's a beautiful PDF with large type, short paragraphs, and mostly white space. that might be a summary of the strategy, a useful reference document, but not the strategy itself. Real strategy documents have tables, competitive findings, audience insights, and positioning frameworks with the actual reasoning written out. They're built to make decisions.




